Define the assessment model
Agree domains, criteria, evidence and the business priorities the assessment should support.
Assess enterprise technology maturity across architecture, applications, integration, data, operating practices and governance. Use an evidence-based baseline to sequence improvements and investment.
Maturity scores alone do not explain the next decision. A useful assessment states the evidence, the target needed for the business ambition and the dependencies between improvements.
Access to current architecture, application inventories, operating records and business priorities.
Agree the scope, dependencies and responsibilities before work begins. Each workstream produces a defined output.
Agree domains, criteria, evidence and the business priorities the assessment should support.
Review systems, documentation, operating evidence and stakeholder perspectives. Distinguish confirmed findings from assumptions.
Set the target capability needed for the business plan. Identify gaps, prerequisites, risk and capability constraints.
Sequence improvements against business value, effort, dependencies and delivery capacity. Define checkpoints for reassessment.
An indicative delivery route. Sequencing and timing follow the scope, dependencies and business readiness. The stages below define the evidence needed to proceed.
| Stage | Practical work | Decision gate | Accountable roles |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01Frame | Agree domains and decision criteria. | Model accepted | Business + CIO |
| 02Assess | Gather and validate evidence. | Baseline reviewed | Domain owners |
| 03Target | Define required future capability. | Target agreed | Business sponsor |
| 04Sequence | Prioritise improvements and dependencies. | Roadmap approved | Portfolio forum |
| 05Reassess | Review evidence after agreed changes. | Baseline updated | Domain owners |
Confirm the roles and authority at the start. Record important decisions, control evidence and the route for unresolved risks.
Explore the core governance pillarOriginal mockups, built to show the structure and level of detail. All records, roles and statuses are illustrative; these are not client results or live product screens.
Illustrative baseline / targets set by business need
The stages, decisions, owners and evidence connecting the recommendation to delivery.
The final pack reflects the agreed scope, with decisions, limitations, owners and next actions documented.
Establish the baseline and agree the measures before assessing improvement. These examples are discussion points, not promised results.
Assessment findings supported by current, traceable evidence.
Actions with dependencies, ownership and clear acceptance criteria.
Changes demonstrated against the agreed baseline and target.
Access to current architecture, application inventories, operating records and business priorities.
Discuss this priorityStart with the business priority, the constraints you face and the decisions worth addressing together.
Discuss your priorities